Technology: Choice or Responsibility?


    As a teacher of almost 25 years, I have seen a shift in students and how they interact with adults, peers, and their learning journey in general.  As I reflect on the past and the days where students were attentive listeners, keen learners, and the classroom was seen as a calmer space in general, I am witness to a societal shift in education.  A shift, I believe, influenced by the role technology. 

How do we educate modern day students who were born into a digital and quickly evolving world? A question we, as educators,  shy away from but are far overdue in asking.

Changes in education have never been more noticeable.  How we teach students and change to accommodate these changes has never been more apparent, need I say urgent. I hear teachers say their classrooms are filled with less learning, less attention, and less calmness. Perhaps it time to consider the lack of motivation and distracting behaviours from our students as perhaps a need, a cry for something more from us. Perhaps our students are ready for a change. A change we, as educators, haven't been ready or able to give them effectively yet. 


                "If we teach today's students as we taught yesterday's,                               we rob them of tomorrow." 

                                                                                                                                     John Dewy

 Alike to many teachers, I have seen attention spans of students dwindle in the last decade and it is easy to blame our environment rather than reflecting on our own practice and how we can better serve our students for their futures. Scott Widman, a middle school teacher,  says it best in his TED talk Technology in the classroom: Good or Bad?  Widman says we know three things;

1. We know technology can be dangerous

2. We know technology can be infinitely valuable 

3. We know technology is here to stay - it isn't slowing down, it is not a fad, and it is the reality of the modern world. 

Clear, concise and so true?! As educators, we can acknowledge the pro's and the con's and resist the path forwards, but the reality is the digital world is not going anywhere and educators have a responsibility to teach the risks and benefits of technology to our students.  We know students are going home to use these devices and going to use them whether we like it or not... there is a need to inform and help students use their devices responsibly and with informed choice. 

    "What's next - it doesn't matter, we have a responsibility.  As educators it is our obligation to teach students the skills of today and to prepare them for lifelong learning". 
                                                                                                                               Marc Prensky              
                            Author of  Education to Better Their World: Unleashing the Power

As proclaimed by Prensky, people who were not born in the digital era and later adopted the new technology are named as “digital immigrants” whereas people who were born during or after the digital era are considered “digital natives”. 

The digital era begins in 1980.  Prensky goes on by comparing the learning styles of Digital Natives to Immigrants, a likely comparison to teachers and students of today.  Generation Z's defining quality is that they have never experienced the world without technology around them.   Technology is considered as less of a device and more of an environment that they inhabit. Prensky goes on by saying that the education system we are currently in was not designed for today's students.  

Today's students are no longer the people our educational...Our Digital Immigrant instructors, who speak an outdated...

  

Some distinguishing comparison between digital and immigrant natives, by Marc Prensky.

Digital Natives

  • Like constant connectivity
  • Prefer to bring their own ubiquitous technologies
  • Prefer immediacy and have short attention spans
  • Use texting and instant message short-hand such as: “c u”, “how r u”, “becoz”
  • Going to the internet first for information
  • Prefer to socialise online and weak in face-to-face communication

Digital Immigrants

  • Prefer to talk on the phone or in person
  • Value ‘proper’ English when texting
  • Prefer formal communication channels, such as phone, detailed emails, or face-to-face communication
  • Do not understand the slang words or phrases on the internet, such as “idk”, “brb”, “t2yl”
  • Printing things out as opposed to working on screen
So as we move forward, what are some key elements to consider in education and for those teaching vs. those learning?  Forward steps clearly seem to include both teaching about the risks and benefits of our digital realms.  I feel, as educators, we have to be clear on the imbalances presented between technology and teaching and do our best to inform ourselves and our learners of the context, trends, and impact (good and bad) these influences have on ourselves, others, and educational structures around us. 

Our best pedagogy, I believe, is best said in a quote by Judith Taack Lanier;

"The fundamental job of a teaching is no longer to distribute facts but to help children learn how to use them by developing their abilitiesto think critically, solve problems, make informed judgements, and create knowledge that benefits both the students and society". (Lanier, 1997)

Similarly, Neil Selwyn explores the complex relationship between digital technology and education, critically analyzing current trends and future possibilities. Selwyn's work serves as a comprehensive guide for those interested in understanding the multifaceted nature of education technology and its future directions. I recommend this read for educators, researchers, and policymakers looking to navigate the rapidly evolving digital landscape in education​.

Selwyn outlines the defines these considerations as 'sociotechnical tensions'.

1. Tensions between personalization and collectivity. How can we reimagine form of technology engagement in education that enhances values of "collectivity, community, and conviviality"?

2. Tensions between inclusivity and exclusivity. How do we reimagine forms of technology in education to address and include issues of equity, diversity, and disadvantage?

3. Tensions between autonomy and automation. How can we imagine forms of educational technology that does not limit the autonmony and agency of teachers and students?

4. Tensions between the commericial and the commons. How can these be reconciled with the design, development and the production of education technologies that are based around values of the public good?
Cute simple love heart line art banner background design vector. Stock  Vector | Adobe Stock

 As we look ahead, it seems we have much to consider. Technology is here whether we like it or not! As teachers we have an ethical responsibility to teach the students of today and to prepare them for tomorrow.  As we consider the goods and the bads of technology, the risks and the benefits, I urge all those involved to critically reflect on the role of technology in education. I urge educators, policymakers, and stakeholders to consider not just the benefits, but also the limitations and potential downsides of educational technologies.

Our responsbility lies in building responsible digital citizens, enhancing collaboration and communication, fostering critical and ethical learning (online and offline), and managing the stress and SEL connected to technology. As we move towards education that is more impactful and engaging for students, how can we blend of the old and the new along side the tools to make informed decisions. Let's hope a blend helps to keep our students motivated by enhancing current learning strategies used in the classroom. Let's hope by learning and taking risks as teachers, we keep our Digital natives engaged and successful - emotionally, socially, and effectively!





References: 

British Columbia Teachers' Federation. (2022, September 20). Screen time and student health. https://www.bctf.ca/news-and-opportunities/news-details/2022/09/20/screen-time-and-student-health

Lanier, J. T. (1997, July 1). Redefining the role of the teacher: It's a multifaceted profession. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/redefining-role-teacher

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf

Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Steinert, S., & Dennis, M. J. (2022). Emotions and digital well-being: On social media’s emotional affordances. Philosophy & Technology, 35(2), 1-21. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-022-00530-6

Widman, S. (2017, May 31). Technology: The best or worst thing for education [Video]. TEDxYouth@BSPR. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5g_9_jl6T8

Wikipedia contributors. (2024, May 22). John Dewey. In Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaRetrieved 19:48, May 23, 2024, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Dewey&oldid=1225165597



Comments

  1. I appreciate the way you are documenting your thinking and learning. You are exploring meaningful themes and ideas and have built a strong foundation for further work. You have a solid list of resources to consult from traditional and non-traditional sources. I am looking forward to seeing where your learning takes you.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts